UN Sustainable Development GoalsBeta

Target 12.7: Sustainable public procurement

Promote public procurement practices that are sustainable, in accordance with national policies and priorities

Necessary Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes. Others must also act.

☆ Follow

Why shareholder democracy is necessary

Public procurement is government conduct, roughly 13 percent of GDP in OECD countries, so agencies set the criteria and place the orders. Corporate suppliers shape what sustainable procurement can buy, and corporate political influence has demonstrably fought the criteria themselves. The Federal Acquisition Regulation Council proposed requiring major federal contractors to disclose greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risk. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed comments urging the Council to "abandon this flawed rule entirely," and the Council withdrew the proposal in January 2025 without finalizing it. Owners voting their values can remove that organized opposition and align supplier lobbying with the standards governments are trying to set. Governments must still adopt and enforce the criteria, so owners remove a necessary obstacle while others must also act.

How this was scoredNecessary

Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes. Others must also act.

We have not yet written down the two answers behind this rating. Recording them on every item, so a reader can check the reasoning and not only the conclusion, is work in progress.

Every rating is the higher of two answers, one for what companies do and one for what they spend to stop the outcome, because the same vote reaches both. See the full method.

Sources

What civil society organizations are helping owners on this

Ceres☆ Followcoordinator

Coordinates the Climate Action 100+ investor campaign asking companies to report whether their direct and trade association lobbying aligns with the Paris Agreement.

Shareholders approve a climate lobbying proposal at Delta, continuing a winning streak that shows the importance of Paris-aligned climate policy, Ceres, 2021-06

Coordinates member proposals asking large companies to disclose lobbying expenditures including payments to trade associations.

ICCR's 2025 Proxy Resolutions and Voting Guide, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2025-03

3 campaigns on record

ICCR members at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Visa Inc.☆ Follow2025 · shareholder proposal

Disclose lobbying expenditures, including payments to the trade associations that lobby on the company's behalf.

Result: Challenged by the companies at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and BlackRock; put to a vote at Visa.

ICCR's 2025 Proxy Resolutions and Voting Guide, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2025-03

Presbyterian Church USA at United Airlines Holdings☆ Follow2021 · shareholder proposal

Report on how the company's direct and trade association lobbying aligns with the Paris Agreement.

Result: 65.4 percent in favour.

Shareholders approve a climate lobbying proposal at Delta, continuing a winning streak that shows the importance of Paris-aligned climate policy, Ceres, 2021-06

Friends Fiduciary Corporation at Norfolk Southern☆ Follow2021 · shareholder proposal

Report on how the company's direct and indirect lobbying through trade associations aligns with the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Result: 76.4 percent in favour.

Shareholders approve a climate lobbying proposal at Delta, continuing a winning streak that shows the importance of Paris-aligned climate policy, Ceres, 2021-06

Explore more goals the world has agreed on

UN Sustainable Development Goals, every item scored for how far it depends on owners voting their values, with the reasoning and the sources behind each rating.

Open the map

How this rating was made

Every item on every one of our maps is read against one question: how far does this depend on the people who own companies voting their values? We answer it twice, once for what companies do and once for what they spend to stop the outcome, and take whichever answer is higher, since the same vote reaches both. The score carries its reasoning and its sources so that a reader can check it rather than take it.

  • Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.
  • Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes, and others must also act.
  • Helpful. Owners voting their values help, and others carry most of it.
  • Independent. This moves without owners. Other levers carry it.

The advocacy record on this page holds only what a source we opened says happened. Where we searched and found nothing, the page says so rather than leaving a silence. Where a campaign names a filer the source does not name, it says that too. Ratings are ours; the list of subjects is UN Sustainable Development Goals's, and we link to their original.

How we score dependency, in full.