UN Sustainable Development GoalsBeta

Target 2.5: Maintain genetic diversity of seeds and animals

By 2020, maintain the genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants and farmed and domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at the national, regional and international levels, and promote access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, as internationally agreed

Necessary Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes. Others must also act.

☆ Follow

Why shareholder democracy is necessary

Commercial seed supply is highly concentrated. USDA ERS reports that Corteva and Bayer alone provided more than half of US corn, soybean and cotton seed sales in 2018-20. It also reports that four firms, Bayer, Corteva, Syngenta and BASF, control the majority of seed and agricultural chemical sales. Breeding priorities and germplasm licensing at a handful of listed companies therefore shape cultivated diversity. On political influence, IATP documents the American Seed Trade Association and US trade agreements requiring partner countries to adopt UPOV 91, which restricts farmers' saving and exchange of seed. Owners have shown they can discipline Bayer, where 55.5 percent voted against the management board in 2019 over the Monsanto acquisition. Public gene banks and treaty rules on benefit sharing remain governmental. Owners therefore supply a necessary input and can lift a lobbying obstacle, while others must act too.

How this was scoredNecessary

Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes. Others must also act.

We have not yet written down the two answers behind this rating. Recording them on every item, so a reader can check the reasoning and not only the conclusion, is work in progress.

Every rating is the higher of two answers, one for what companies do and one for what they spend to stop the outcome, because the same vote reaches both. See the full method.

Sources

What civil society organizations are helping owners on this

As You Sow☆ Followfiler

Filed the 2025 General Mills proposal seeking disclosure of the pesticide use reductions achieved through the company's regenerative agriculture program, and has run engagements with food companies on genetically modified ingredients.

28% of General Mills Shareholders Vote in Support of Pesticide Disclosure, As You Sow, 2025-10

Union Investmentvoter

Voted against Bayer's management and supervisory boards at the 2019 annual meeting over the Monsanto acquisition.

Bayer's Chairman Faces No-Confidence Vote Over Monsanto Deal, Fortune, 2019-04

2 campaigns on record

As You Sow at General Mills☆ Follow2025 · shareholder proposal

Disclose the pesticide use reductions achieved through its regenerative agriculture program.

With Mercy Investment Services

Result: 28 percent in favor

28% of General Mills Shareholders Vote in Support of Pesticide Disclosure, As You Sow, 2025-10

Deka Investment at Bayer☆ Follow2019 · vote-no campaign

Withhold discharge from the management and supervisory boards over the legal and financial risks of the Monsanto seed and agrochemical acquisition.

With Union Investment

Result: not stated in source; ISS and Glass Lewis both recommended voting against board discharge, and BlackRock and DWS were reported as planning to abstain or vote against

Bayer's Chairman Faces No-Confidence Vote Over Monsanto Deal, Fortune, 2019-04

Explore more goals the world has agreed on

UN Sustainable Development Goals, every item scored for how far it depends on owners voting their values, with the reasoning and the sources behind each rating.

Open the map

How this rating was made

Every item on every one of our maps is read against one question: how far does this depend on the people who own companies voting their values? We answer it twice, once for what companies do and once for what they spend to stop the outcome, and take whichever answer is higher, since the same vote reaches both. The score carries its reasoning and its sources so that a reader can check it rather than take it.

  • Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.
  • Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes, and others must also act.
  • Helpful. Owners voting their values help, and others carry most of it.
  • Independent. This moves without owners. Other levers carry it.

The advocacy record on this page holds only what a source we opened says happened. Where we searched and found nothing, the page says so rather than leaving a silence. Where a campaign names a filer the source does not name, it says that too. Ratings are ours; the list of subjects is UN Sustainable Development Goals's, and we link to their original.

How we score dependency, in full.