UN Sustainable Development GoalsBeta

Target 3.a: Strengthen tobacco control

Strengthen the implementation of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in all countries, as appropriate

Necessary Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes. Others must also act.

☆ Follow

Why shareholder democracy is necessary

Tobacco kills more than 7 million people a year. WHO states there is a fundamental and irreconcilable conflict between the industry's interests and public health. The FCTC has 182 parties plus the European Union, but only 41 countries tax tobacco to the WHO-recommended level. Industry political influence is a central obstacle to implementation. The Global Tobacco Industry Interference Index 2023 found protections deteriorated in 43 of 80 countries. It found companies successfully lobbying to end bans on e-cigarettes, heated products or nicotine pouches in Egypt, Kenya and Uruguay. It also found companies targeting delegations to the treaty's Conference of the Parties. Much of the industry is listed, including Altria, Philip Morris International, BAT and Japan Tobacco. Altria alone reported 12.37 million dollars of US federal lobbying in 2025. Owners can therefore curb the marketing, product and lobbying conduct that obstructs the treaty across large parts of the world. The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility works this lever directly; its members filed a 2016 shareholder resolution asking Walgreens to review the risks of selling tobacco in its drugstores, pointing to CVS's 2014 exit from tobacco sales. The largest producer, however, is the state-owned China National Tobacco Corporation. It supplies about 43.6 percent of the global cigarette market and lies beyond any shareholder's reach. The treaty's measures must also be legislated and enforced by governments. Owners remove a necessary obstacle while states must act to deliver the outcome.

How this was scoredNecessary

Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes. Others must also act.

We have not yet written down the two answers behind this rating. Recording them on every item, so a reader can check the reasoning and not only the conclusion, is work in progress.

Every rating is the higher of two answers, one for what companies do and one for what they spend to stop the outcome, because the same vote reaches both. See the full method.

Sources

What civil society organizations are helping owners on this

Its members, led by the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia and Trinity Health, file proposals on tobacco sales at retailers and on lobbying disclosure at Altria and engage Philip Morris International on its lobbying of Congress and the FDA.

Corporate Engagement, Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, 2025

Filed proposals at Kroger and Walgreens on the public health and environmental costs of tobacco sales and engages Philip Morris International on lobbying and the marketing of IQOS and Zyn.

Corporate Engagement, Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, 2025

Trinity Health☆ Followfiler

Lead filer of a 2021 proposal asking Altria to report annually on its lobbying payments, grassroots lobbying and memberships in groups that write model legislation.

Notice of Exempt Solicitation: Altria Group, Inc. lobbying disclosure proposal, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR), 2021-05

4 campaigns on record

Address the company's lobbying of Congress and the FDA on new nicotine products and its marketing of IQOS heated tobacco and Zyn nicotine pouches.

Result: not stated in source

Corporate Engagement, Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, 2025

Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia at Kroger☆ Follow2024 · shareholder proposal

Commission and disclose a report on the external public health costs created by the company's sale of tobacco products.

With Sisters of Charity of St. Elizabeth, Sisters of the Humility of Mary, CommonSpirit Health, Bon Secours Mercy Health

Result: not stated in source

Notice of Exempt Solicitation: The Kroger Company, Proposal 4 on public health costs of tobacco sales, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR), 2024

Trinity Health at Altria☆ Follow2021 · shareholder proposal

Publish an annual report disclosing lobbying policies, direct, indirect and grassroots lobbying payments and recipients, memberships in organizations that write model legislation, and board oversight of those expenditures.

With Reynders, McVeigh Capital Management, Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet, St. Paul Province

Result: not stated in source

Notice of Exempt Solicitation: Altria Group, Inc. lobbying disclosure proposal, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR), 2021-05

Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia at Walgreens Boots Alliance☆ Follow2016 · shareholder resolution

Report within six months on the financial risk, including long term legal and reputational risk, of continuing to sell tobacco products in the company's stores.

With Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace, Sisters of the Humility of Mary, Sisters of Charity of St. Elizabeth, Trinity Health

Result: It never reached a vote. Walgreens asked the Securities and Exchange Commission for permission to leave the proposal out of its proxy, and the staff said it would not object to the company omitting it as a matter of ordinary business under Rule 14a-8(i)(7). The company's report of the January 26, 2017 annual meeting lists no tobacco proposal among the six items voted on.

We found no documented change. Walgreens continued to sell tobacco.

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.; Rule 14a-8 no-action letter (Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia and others), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Corporation Finance, 2016-11-07

Related subjects on other maps

Common Ground

Explore more goals the world has agreed on

UN Sustainable Development Goals, every item scored for how far it depends on owners voting their values, with the reasoning and the sources behind each rating.

Open the map

How this rating was made

Every item on every one of our maps is read against one question: how far does this depend on the people who own companies voting their values? We answer it twice, once for what companies do and once for what they spend to stop the outcome, and take whichever answer is higher, since the same vote reaches both. The score carries its reasoning and its sources so that a reader can check it rather than take it.

  • Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.
  • Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes, and others must also act.
  • Helpful. Owners voting their values help, and others carry most of it.
  • Independent. This moves without owners. Other levers carry it.

The advocacy record on this page holds only what a source we opened says happened. Where we searched and found nothing, the page says so rather than leaving a silence. Where a campaign names a filer the source does not name, it says that too. Ratings are ours; the list of subjects is UN Sustainable Development Goals's, and we link to their original.

How we score dependency, in full.