Common Ground of the American PeopleBeta

Give electric bus manufacturers a tax credit of 10% of the sales price

Energy and environment

Helpful Owners voting their values help. Others must carry most of it.

☆ Follow

Why shareholder democracy is helpful

The credit is enacted by Congress, so the goal itself sits with government. Corporate behavior helps at the margin: bus manufacturers would claim this credit, decide what buses to build, and lobby on the policies around it. Automaker advocacy is documented on both sides: InfluenceMap found 14 of 15 major automakers opposed at least one electric vehicle policy, while Ceres organized major companies to defend clean economy tax credits in Congress in April 2025. Owners can align company lobbying behind the credit, but only Congress can keep it in the code. No such credit has ever been enacted, and Congress moved the other way in July 2025 by ending the commercial clean vehicle credit closest to it, so the obstacle is congressional priorities rather than any corporate campaign against electric buses.

How this was scoredHelpful

Helpful. Owners voting their values help. Others must carry most of it.

We have not yet written down the two answers behind this rating. Recording them on every item, so a reader can check the reasoning and not only the conclusion, is work in progress.

Every rating is the higher of two answers, one for what companies do and one for what they spend to stop the outcome, because the same vote reaches both. See the full method.

Sources

What civil society organizations are helping owners on this

Ceres☆ Followcoordinator

Coordinates the investor network campaign asking companies, including transport and vehicle manufacturers, to disclose whether their direct and trade association lobbying aligns with the Paris Agreement.

Shareholders Escalate Campaign Pressing Companies to 'Walk Their Talk' on Climate Lobbying, Ceres, 2022

Documented the 2021 climate lobbying resolution season, including the withdrawals at General Motors and other companies that agreed to improve climate lobbying disclosure.

Shareholders Approve a Climate Lobbying Proposal at Delta, Continuing a Winning Streak that Shows the Importance of Paris-Aligned Climate Policy, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2021

3 campaigns on record

Boston Trust Walden at United Parcel Service☆ Follow2022 · shareholder proposal

Report on the company's lobbying policies, expenditures and trade association payments.

Result: Taken to a vote; result not stated in source

we found no documented change

Shareholders Escalate Campaign Pressing Companies to 'Walk Their Talk' on Climate Lobbying, Ceres, 2022

not stated in source at General Motors☆ Follow2021 · shareholder proposal

Evaluate and disclose how the company's direct and trade association lobbying aligns with the Paris Agreement.

Result: Withdrawn after the company agreed to improve its climate lobbying disclosure

General Motors agreed to improve climate lobbying disclosure, and the filers withdrew the resolution.

Shareholders Approve a Climate Lobbying Proposal at Delta, Continuing a Winning Streak that Shows the Importance of Paris-Aligned Climate Policy, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2021

not stated in source at Ford Motor Company☆ Follow2019 · exempt solicitation

Prepare an annual report disclosing lobbying policies, expenditures and oversight, including trade association lobbying, and show whether that lobbying is consistent with the Paris Agreement and the company's stated climate commitments.

Result: not stated in source

Notice of Exempt Solicitation, Ford Motor Company Proposal 6 on lobbying disclosure, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR), 2019-04

Related subjects on other maps

UN SDGs

Explore more matters Americans already agree on

Common Ground of the American People, every item scored for how far it depends on owners voting their values, with the reasoning and the sources behind each rating.

Open the map

How this rating was made

Every item on every one of our maps is read against one question: how far does this depend on the people who own companies voting their values? We answer it twice, once for what companies do and once for what they spend to stop the outcome, and take whichever answer is higher, since the same vote reaches both. The score carries its reasoning and its sources so that a reader can check it rather than take it.

  • Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.
  • Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes, and others must also act.
  • Helpful. Owners voting their values help, and others carry most of it.
  • Independent. This moves without owners. Other levers carry it.

The advocacy record on this page holds only what a source we opened says happened. Where we searched and found nothing, the page says so rather than leaving a silence. Where a campaign names a filer the source does not name, it says that too. Ratings are ours; the list of subjects is Common Ground of the American People's, and we link to their original.

How we score dependency, in full.