JUST CapitalBeta

Provides benefits and work-life balance

Workers

Pivotal Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.

☆ Follow

Why shareholder democracy is pivotal

Paid sick days, family leave and a schedule a worker learns about more than a day in advance are employer policies, granted or withheld by the company offering the job, which is why this outcome sits inside corporate conduct and rates at the top of the scale. Investors have pressed hard on it: a letter signed by 150 institutional investors representing $3.6 trillion in assets went to more than 40 companies asking them to make pandemic era paid sick leave permanent, with shareholder proposals filed at CVS, Kroger, Target and TJX. Companies answered differently, and some resisted by procedure rather than at the ballot box, Walmart having asked the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2021 for permission to leave a paid sick leave feasibility proposal off its proxy as ordinary business. The organized political opposition on record mostly belongs to nobody a shareholder vote reaches. Maine's state and Portland regional chambers of commerce and the hospitality trade group HospitalityMaine opposed that state's 2023 paid family and medical leave bill as too costly; HospitalityMaine's membership is open to independent owners, inns, branded hotels, franchisees and other lodging establishments, its restaurant dues run in tiers from under $200,000 to over $4,000,000 in food and beverage sales, and no publicly traded chain is named among its members in anything reviewed here. The sharpest instrument found is Florida's HB 433, signed in April 2024, which bars local governments from enacting predictive scheduling ordinances as well as living wage ones, and a compliance guide published by the scheduling software company Homebase lists eleven states commonly cited for preempting local fair workweek laws against Oregon and ten cities that enforce one. Reporting ties the drafting of HB 433 to Florida Chamber of Commerce lobbyists without establishing that the chamber is funded by publicly traded members, so that spending narrows the public route rather than standing in the way of the outcome itself. A benefit is still in the gift of the employer, who can grant it without asking permission of anyone, which is why corporate conduct decides this one.

How this was scoredPivotal

Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.

We have not yet written down the two answers behind this rating. Recording them on every item, so a reader can check the reasoning and not only the conclusion, is work in progress.

Every rating is the higher of two answers, one for what companies do and one for what they spend to stop the outcome, because the same vote reaches both. See the full method.

Sources

What civil society organizations are helping owners on this

United for Respect☆ Followfiler

Lead filer of a 2021 Walmart proposal asking for a feasibility study of two weeks of paid sick leave and family care leave as a standard associate benefit, which Walmart sought to exclude as ordinary business.

Walmart Inc.; Rule 14a-8 no-action request (incoming letter), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2021-02

Coordinated 150 institutional investors with 3.6 trillion dollars in assets asking more than 40 companies to adopt permanent paid sick leave for all employees, and later organized paid sick leave proposals at Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific.

Investors Escalate Pressure on Companies to Adopt Paid Sick Leave Policies, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2022-01

8 campaigns on record

Trillium Asset Management at Union Pacific Corporation☆ Follow2024 · shareholder proposal

Adopt and disclose a policy that all employees can use paid sick leave without being subject to discipline under the company's attendance policies.

Result: Withdrawn after agreement

Union Pacific agreed to state in its next sustainability report that employees cannot face discipline for taking sick days.

Union Pacific Corporation, Paid Sick Leave (2024), Trillium Asset Management, 2024

Impact Shares at Norfolk Southern☆ Follow2023 · shareholder proposal

Adopt an employer-paid sick leave policy as a standard, perennial benefit.

Result: not stated in source

Investors Call for Paid Sick Leave Policy at Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific Railways, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, 2022-12

Trillium Asset Management at Union Pacific Corporation☆ Follow2023 · shareholder proposal

Adopt an employer-paid sick leave policy for all employees as a standard, perennial benefit.

Result: 53,102,043 votes for, 400,261,287 against, 7,238,541 abstentions at the May 18, 2023 annual meeting; rejected

Union Pacific Corporation Form 8-K, annual meeting voting results, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR), 2023-05

Figure 8 Investment Strategies at TJX Companies☆ Follow2023 · shareholder resolution

Asked TJX to adopt and publicly disclose a policy letting all employees, part-time and full-time, accrue paid sick leave usable after a reasonable probationary period, with no expiration date or pandemic-only condition.

Result: 22.29% of votes were in favor at the June 6, 2023 annual meeting; the proposal did not pass.

We found no documented change to TJX's sick leave policy following this vote.

Paid sick leave at TJX COMPANIES, INC., PRI Collaboration Platform

Trillium Asset Management at CVS Health, Target Corporation, Kroger☆ Follow2022 · shareholder resolution

Asked each retailer to make the paid sick leave benefit it had offered during the pandemic a permanent policy for all employees.

Result: CVS Health asked the SEC for permission to leave the proposal off its ballot. The sources reviewed did not confirm that Target, Kroger, or TJX took similar action.

We found no documented company in this group that adopted a permanent paid sick leave policy specifically attributed to this campaign in the sources reviewed.

Activist investors push retailers to strengthen sick leave policies, Axios

United Church Funds at Amazon☆ Follow2022 · shareholder resolution

Asked Amazon's board to establish paid sick leave for all employees, arguing the company could afford it.

Result: Amazon reported that shareholders voted against every resolution on the ballot at its May 25, 2022 annual meeting. The sources reviewed did not include the exact vote percentage for this specific proposal.

We found no documented company-wide paid sick leave policy adopted by Amazon that any source attributes to this proposal.

The 2022 Amazon Proposals, ICCR

Organization United for Respect at Walmart☆ Follow2021 · shareholder proposal

Study the feasibility of providing two weeks of paid sick leave, and two weeks of paid leave to care for a sick or quarantined family member or a child whose school or child care is closed, as a standard associate benefit not limited to COVID-19.

With School Sisters of Notre Dame Cooperative Investment Fund, Daughters of Charity, Inc., Everence Financial, BMO Asset Management, Inc.

Result: not stated in source

Walmart asked the SEC for permission to exclude the proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(7) as ordinary business.

Walmart Inc.; Rule 14a-8 no-action request (incoming letter), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2021-02

Asked each company's board to report on the feasibility of making paid sick leave a standard employee benefit beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

With As You Sow, CtW Investment Group, ICCR members

Result: Filed in December 2020 for the 2021 proxy season at seven companies. The sources reviewed did not confirm individual vote outcomes.

We found no documented company in this group that adopted permanent paid sick leave specifically attributed to this campaign in the sources reviewed.

As Covid Spikes, Investors Press for Paid Sick Leave for Frontline Retail and Food Workers, ICCR

Related subjects on other maps

UN SDGs

Common Ground

Doughnut

Explore more what the public asks of companies

JUST Capital, every item scored for how far it depends on owners voting their values, with the reasoning and the sources behind each rating.

Open the map

How this rating was made

Every item on every one of our maps is read against one question: how far does this depend on the people who own companies voting their values? We answer it twice, once for what companies do and once for what they spend to stop the outcome, and take whichever answer is higher, since the same vote reaches both. The score carries its reasoning and its sources so that a reader can check it rather than take it.

  • Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.
  • Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes, and others must also act.
  • Helpful. Owners voting their values help, and others carry most of it.
  • Independent. This moves without owners. Other levers carry it.

The advocacy record on this page holds only what a source we opened says happened. Where we searched and found nothing, the page says so rather than leaving a silence. Where a campaign names a filer the source does not name, it says that too. Ratings are ours; the list of subjects is JUST Capital's, and we link to their original.

How we score dependency, in full.